Jump to content

Welcome to TheMalibuCrew.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Weight versus Dry Weight


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1
Year Round Skiier

Year Round Skiier
  • Ballast Buddy
  • 1 posts
  • Joined April 18, 2011
  • Location: Denver, Colorado
  • Boat: 2000 Response LX
I serve on the HOA Board for Riviera Lake in Denver, CO We have restrictions on the size and weight of inboard boats built prior to 2004, that limit boat size to 21 feet and 2,250 pounds "Dry Weight". Boats built after 2004 are allowed if they are AWSA tournament approved, slalom towboats, 21 feet or shorter and 2,800 pounds or less "Dry Weight". No wake enhancement is allowed. We have a new homeowner who has a 1995 Malibu Echelon (closed bow) with origiinal Malibu spec's of 20 feet and "Weight " of 2,350. Is there a difference in "Dry Weight" versus "Weight". In other words did Weight include a full tanlk of gas and other items not included in "Dry Weight".

#2
Bill_AirJunky

Bill_AirJunky
  • Waaaaay Too Many
  • 9,324 posts
  • Joined August 12, 2005
  • Location: Liberty Lake, WA
  • Boat: 2005 Malibu vRide
Boat House View Boat House
Dry weight means no oil, gas, ballast, nothing at all.

Weight I assume is a Coast Guard thing. So it could be fully outfitted & sliding off the trailer.

#3
eyepeeler

eyepeeler
  • 'Bu Savant
  • 682 posts
  • Joined May 06, 2008
  • Boat: 2001 Response LX
Weight = Dry Weight

#4
jk13

jk13
  • Seeking A Life
  • 2,793 posts
  • Joined November 23, 2009
  • Location: Central WI
  • Boat: 1994 Echelon LX
Boat House View Boat House
1995 Echelon weight=2000 Response LX weight. :whistle:

#5
WakingMeHappy

WakingMeHappy
  • Spam Happy
  • 3,930 posts
  • Joined November 07, 2006
  • Location: MS
  • Boat: 1999 Sunsetter LXI
Boat House View Boat House
I would have to ask why you have a weight restriction on boats based on the year model? Weight is weight, what does the year have to do with it?

#6
REW

REW
  • Seeking A Life
  • 2,388 posts
  • Joined March 08, 2008
  • Location: Mountain Island Lake West side of CLT
  • Boat: 2004 Wakesetter

I would have to ask why you have a weight restriction on boats based on the year model? Weight is weight, what does the year have to do with it?


Boats built after 2004 are allowed if they are AWSA tournament approved, slalom towboats, 21 feet or shorter and 2,800 pounds or less "Dry Weight".


newer boats are allowed to be heaver.

My question is why does it matter if all are AWSA tow boats?

#7
Woodski

Woodski
  • Crew Devotee
  • 1,786 posts
  • Joined February 21, 2007
  • Boat: 1994 Echelon LX
As much as there is a difference in definition for boat weight, there appears to be a significant discrepancy in the allowable boat specifications allowed for the lake. The 95 Echelon is an approved AWSA tournament towboat. Current slalom ski boats average around 2800 lbs, those in the mid '90's average 2400 lbs. The printed material I have seen does not really specify wet or dry weight, but I have not seen any information that lists an Echelon at under 2250 lbs. The Gekko is the only one I have seen down below that. One might take the boat to a set of scales and see what number pops up. The hull on the Echelon is basically the same as a post 2004 Response, SV23. The two changes were only minor revisions.

#8
jk13

jk13
  • Seeking A Life
  • 2,793 posts
  • Joined November 23, 2009
  • Location: Central WI
  • Boat: 1994 Echelon LX
Boat House View Boat House
The reason for the question is to figure out if the Echelon will be approved to be used on this lake, right? The OP has in his profile listed his own boat as a 2000 Response LX. What I posted above is that the listed weight for both boats is the SAME. So if the Response LX is allowed, there can be no reason why the Echelon can't be as they are actually the same boat with a different dash panel. If anything the RLX may weigh a tad more because of the walkover and bow seating.

My personal hope is that the OP is trying to get the Echelon approved, not banned. I'm not saying this is the case, but I've seen situations where HOAs try to keep older boats off the lake even though the rules don't state years of manufacture.

Hopefully it all works out for everyone involved.

#9
NorCaliBu

NorCaliBu
  • Waaaaay Too Many
  • 6,370 posts
  • Joined April 08, 2005
  • Location: Say My Name...
  • Boat: Small and Fast
Boat House View Boat House

The OP has in his profile listed his own boat as a 2000 Response LX... So if the Response LX is allowed, there can be no reason why the Echelon can't be ...


Good catch. :lol: The OP's boat is 100 pounds over the weight limit just as the Echelon is. What a predicament.... :Doh:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users